follow us:Google+FacebookLinkedInTwitterVimeoRSS Feeds

advertisement

Administration releases new regulations on Obamacare's contraception mandate

By

Back to Top Comments Email Print

Proposed new regulations on contraceptives for employees of nonprofit religious organizations and closely held for-profit companies objecting to such coverage were released today.

The proposals come in the form of interim final regulations. They address the Supreme Court's June rulings on the two significant cases on the issue as follows.

Conestoga Wood and Hobby Lobby: As widely expected, the plan would expand the existing nonprofit accommodation to objecting for-profit companies. The accommodations say the organizations do not have to contract, arrange, pay or refer for contraceptive coverage, with insurers instead required to provide separate payments for contraceptive services for the women in the health plan of the organization, at no cost to the women or to the organization.

"As explained in the final rules, issuers will find that providing such payments is cost-neutral," a fact sheet released today says.

The proposal describes two alternative approaches for defining an objecting for-profit. Under one approach, the entity could not be publicly traded and ownership of the entity would be limited to a certain number of owners. Under the other, the entity could not be publicly traded and a minimum percentage of ownership would be concentrated among a certain number of owners. The number and concentration are not specified in the proposed rules.

• Wheaton College: The proposal would adjust the accommodation requirements. Currently, objecting nonprofits must notify their insurers, which some nonprofits have protested because that act triggers the provision of the contraceptives to which they object. In response, today's proposal says an eligible organization may notify the Department of Health and Human Services in writing of its religious objection to contraception coverage, and HHS will then notify the insurer.

Heather Stauffer

Heather Stauffer

Heather Stauffer covers Lancaster County, nonprofits, education and health care. Have a tip or question for her? Email her at heathers@cpbj.com. Follow her on Twitter, @StaufferCPBJ.

advertisement

Comments


karen said:
I agree with dugadee. as an anti-military industrial complex taxpayer i am forced to tax payer fund the multiple US wars and invasions. US defense industry benefits and human services lose. I hate funding this appropriation ,,,, BUT I will, under duress in central PA. Oligarchs are us.

August 28, 2014 10:44 am

dugadee said:
This is simply deceptive smoke and mirrors. Demanding that insurers "pay" for and provide these services without any cost to the the person or the organization, simply means that the Insurers will pass on those additional costs to everyone else's rates. So that we ALL are forced into subsidizing these same specific onerous (to some) practices for others for which they won't have to pay for themselves, ... BUT we will! Another unfair, coercive and unreasonable part of a one size fits all O-care.

August 22, 2014 5:08 pm



Please note: All comments will be reviewed and may take up to 24 hours to appear on the site.

Post Comment
     View Comment Policy
advertisement
  
  
advertisement
  
  
advertisement
Back to Top